![]() Having a test environment where the only difference was adding the Buildkite agent was a trivial addition. Running my app in a production (or production-like) environment was already a solved problem, because everything was already in some form of "everything as code". Eventually it dawned on me why this approach was more ingenious than I realised: It took me a while to get around to Buildkite because at first I didn't see much point given it seemed like you had to run the agent yourself. I think I've tried most of the CI tools out there at some point. "Robust CI with awesome Docker support" is the top reason why over 16 developers like GitLab CI, while over 52 developers mention "Easy to configure" as the leading cause for choosing TeamCity.Īccording to the StackShare community, GitLab CI has a broader approval, being mentioned in 206 company stacks & 90 developers stacks compared to TeamCity, which is listed in 168 company stacks and 51 developer stacks. GitLab CI and TeamCity can be primarily classified as "Continuous Integration" tools. ![]() It is trivial to setup and absolutely free for small teams and open source projects. TeamCity is a user-friendly continuous integration (CI) server for professional developers, build engineers, and DevOps. ![]() gitlab-ci.yml file to the root directory of your repository, and configure your GitLab project to use a Runner, then each merge request or push triggers your CI pipeline TeamCity: TeamCity is an ultimate Continuous Integration tool for professionals. GitLab offers a continuous integration service. GitLab CI: GitLab integrated CI to test, build and deploy your code. GitLab CI vs TeamCity: What are the differences?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |